Wessex Water Cuts Energy Costs
by Melanie Brown
Article first published in Water & Waste Treatment July 2002
Benchmarking (the comparison of similar
plants operating at different sites) is becoming an increasingly important tool
for optimising performance of process plant. It can identify areas where
operating costs are unnecessarily high and where the use of power, water or raw
materials can be reduced.
Wessex Water is undertaking a major
evaluation of its power consumption at 28 of its wastewater treatment plants
and five water treatment plants in conjunction with Meniscus Systems. The study
includes 20 of Wessex' largest wastewater treatment plants and eight smaller
plants, where power consumption is considered high. The project commenced in
June 2001 at some of the smaller treatment plants and expanded in December 2001
to include the larger sites as well; monitoring is expected to continue until
December 2002. The objective is to derive power costs for specific unit
processes on all the sites to allow benchmarking to compare performance at
different sites. Unit processes with excessively high energy consumption can be
identified and this can trigger investigation and potential cost savings. The
study is unique in measuring performance at monthly intervals over a 12-18
month period; previous attempts to compare performance at different plants have
largely been one-off 'snapshot' assessments which have not taken account of
monthly variations.
Wessex Water has established an extensive,
systematic monitoring programme at all its water and wastewater treatment
sites. The data collected is currently faxed to Meniscus Systems by operators
at the different sites. Data can also be supplied to Meniscus via the web, a
handheld computer, a Process Toolbox or a SCADA/telemetry system. If the
frequency of monitoring increases, Wessex is likely to start entering data via
the web site. Meniscus' web-based process management service provides analysis
and interpretation to help to optimise plant performance and minimise costs.
The Intelligent Plant Monitoring software uses a specialist monitoring and
targeting database developed by Meniscus to enhance reporting and analysis. It
provides detailed process and cost information and can generate an emailed
response to highlight possible operating problems.
Monthly reports are sent to key Wessex
personnel via the internet. By collecting data over many months, Meniscus has
been able to establish operating trends for each Wessex site, which are
displayed as three-dimensional plots for a number of processes. Meniscus
receives a total of 1400 parameters on a monthly basis from all the wastewater
treatment plant in five different areas of processing (Table).
Wessex is using the information to benchmark
performance and to highlight sites with higher than average power consumption
in the particular process areas. This allows further investigation and
optimisation of power use. To date, process area monitoring has identified two
sites with a 40% higher than average energy consumption for activated sludge
treatment and this is currently being investigated. Some excessively high costs
for ventilation and odour removal have also been highlighted at one plant. One
of Wessex' two new membrane bioreactors has been shown to be operating at the
lower end of its theoretical energy consumption, whereas the other is operating
at the higher end; further investigation is underway to identify the cause of
the high power consumption.
The project is also monitoring chemical
consumption at the plants and is likely to include compliance monitoring at a
later date. Wessex operators currently enter effluent compliance data into
their mobile phones and text it to a central Vodaphone database. Meniscus is
planning to incorporate this database into the plant monitoring system and
display it on the web site. This could be used to generate email warnings if
discharge consents were exceeded. The rapid response of the system allows
warnings to be generated in as little as 1-2 minutes. While the first stage of
the project is concerned with monitoring energy consumption, the second stage
will apply statistical process control rules to the data to identify how energy
consumption affects compliance. For example, the effect of reducing the power
consumption for aeration on the compliance of the plant and the risk of
breaching consent can be investigated.
Although the project is aimed at reducing
power costs, it has also generated a lot of interest within Wessex on process
design, since this is the first time that the company has been able to confirm
the true power costs for each specific unit process. It has increased awareness
of the costs of different processes and this is likely to affect plant design
in the future.
Dave Andrews, Energy Manager at Wessex Water,
explains that the external processing and management of data by Meniscus is an
advantage because it saves operators and managers time and allows them to
concentrate on analysing results and implementing solutions. The Meniscus
system allows all the data from a series of remote sites to be stored in one
central location so that it can be compared and managed by a central team.
Wessex personnel find the three-dimensional, colour bar charts comparing energy
consumption clear and easy to interpret.
Andrews considers the investment in the
Meniscus process area management project has been well worth while. Additional
monitoring was required to undertake the project, but it has already saved
£50,000 at one activated sludge works, where the waste was being 'over-treated'
by excessive aeration. He believes that it is realistic to expect to save up to
5% of the process budget by benchmarking energy costs. Wessex is also
interested in benchmarking power consumption performance of its plants against
plants operated by other water companies and believes that such a comparison
could benefit the whole water industry.
Table: Process Areas in which Data is
collected
| Process Area
|
Sub-processes
|
| Lift pumping
|
Inlet pumping, inlet works power
|
| Process pumping
|
Ventilation, chemical dosing, return activate sludge & S
activated sludge pumping, sludge pumping, distribution (including recirculation
for percolating filters)
|
| Biological treatment
|
Nitrifying activated sludge plant, non-nitrifying activated
sludge plant, biological aerated filter, submerged biological contactors,
membrane bioreactors, submerged aerated filters, percolating filters and VITOX
|
| Sludge processing
|
Sludge digestion, sludge thickening
|
| Tertiary treatment
|
UV treatment
|
|